The Online Community About Exciting New CAD Technologies
Exporting for CAM
What is the fastest method of exporting a design / assembly from spaceclaim to CAM or other software?
I just have a rather small assembly that is made up of say 50 to 60 parts today. All except two or three are to be CNC milled or turned. So, I need to export them all as individual ACIS.sat files, because our CAM software is ACIS based.
The classical method would be to open each of the 60 components one by one and save as ACIS. That would take say 1 to 2 minutes per part, including browsing, creating folders and typing the accurate names in the save dialog.
The preferred method, though, would be to open the assembly file and export with a "multi file option" as 60 individual files in one go. The files would automatically be named according to component names, of course, while nested folders automatically created represent the structure tree. The BOM would be automatically exported as a spreadsheet and placed in the topmost folder, too. Time saved: Approx 1,5 to 2 hours.
Now think of an assembly that has a few hundred parts ... that sums up.
Is there a way to do the above economically in Spaceclaim?
Or, if not: Will there be?
Martin
I just have a rather small assembly that is made up of say 50 to 60 parts today. All except two or three are to be CNC milled or turned. So, I need to export them all as individual ACIS.sat files, because our CAM software is ACIS based.
The classical method would be to open each of the 60 components one by one and save as ACIS. That would take say 1 to 2 minutes per part, including browsing, creating folders and typing the accurate names in the save dialog.
The preferred method, though, would be to open the assembly file and export with a "multi file option" as 60 individual files in one go. The files would automatically be named according to component names, of course, while nested folders automatically created represent the structure tree. The BOM would be automatically exported as a spreadsheet and placed in the topmost folder, too. Time saved: Approx 1,5 to 2 hours.
Now think of an assembly that has a few hundred parts ... that sums up.
Is there a way to do the above economically in Spaceclaim?
Or, if not: Will there be?
Martin
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Bock on -
I would be curious how the SpaceClaim guys respond to this. If their "open" format is documented well enough like the microsoft office XML formats it should be easy to create a tool to manipulate the files within the zip/XML container. One of the main reasons I am attracted to SpaceClaim is the open document format. I would like to build my own PDM system around this format. One of the first two tests will be to be able to programmatically break apart an "internal" assembly into a collection of seperate component parts, and be able to analyze a component file and check for missing document properties. This last test will allow me to compare a file against a "start part" and will allow me to correct a component not created using a standardize "start part".
-
Permalink Reply by martin kopplow on -
The XML container indeed has all the information I need and it is almost organized in the preferred manner, it's only that SC uses cryptical names and the binary ACIS format while almost all other applications (and this includes our CAM system) require data to be available in ACIS text format.
Maybe a little program that could open the XML container, batch-convert and accurately re-name the files inside the Spaceclaim/geometry folder would do most of what I need. I am not a gifted programmer, though.
Is there any ACIS binary-to-text-converter publically available?
Martin
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Horrox on -
Hello Martin,
Im curious as to which CAM package you are using please, im having problems exporting directly out of SC into EdgeCAM?
-
Permalink Reply by martin kopplow on
-
Hello Paul,
we are using a CAM package by Schott Systems.
You may find more info here: www.schott-systeme.com
It looks a bit like a jeweler's tool and the name might be misleading: It is in fact quite powerful.
Sorry, I never tried edgeCAM. What modelling kernel is it built upon?
Martin
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Horrox on
-
Hi Martin,
Never heard of that one before but it certainly looks capable.
EdgeCAM is CAM only so no engine to speak of. I do however of a Solid Machinist license which is supposed to read ACIS but something aint quite right. I'm working with both parties to help find a solution.....
Advertising
Latest Activity
Thanks for the reply.
1. I have played around a little bit with it. It's a very powerful tool for selecting elements with in solids, but doesn't work at all with components. It would be nice if that selection tool would find attributes of a compone…
Hi Dennis,
1. Did you notice the selection tab under the component tree? You might want to play around with that one and see what it can do for you.
4. You can move any direction you like, but you need to use the move tool. I know Cinema4D as quit…
As a drawing is always referring to a certain component, it will by default include everything within the component. It would be possible, though, to create one more drawing and hide those elements not needed for the purpose. If you go on with your…
Thanks for the reply.
1. This worked. Although I would like to see something similar to Rhino's selection filter. Where you can filter out certain elements before you draw a selection box. For instance if I wanted to just select components it would…
I was thinking of something similar to Microstation's clip volume. Although maybe I am thinking about wrong. If you have a large complex assembly and want to show a detail of how 2 parts fit together without showing all the other parts around it. Ho…
Hmmm... I could not find any anomalities in SC 2010 so far. I think the hierarchy driven alignment preferences have always been ab bit ugly. I'd prefer if the alignment direction would be defined by the sequence of selection. The object selected fir…
In former versions I did not have any problems with it. But with V.2010 it is unpredictable. I agree with you Martin that the anchor constraint wil work but it is extra mouseclicks and I do not believe this is the way it is supposed to be.
These are the choices you have, no depth. Never heard of that one, though.
Martin
1. right click on model -> select -> component/body/face
2. no, except they are all inside one big component.
3. No, unfortunately, except for mirrored ones, as the mirror plane will appear as you select them.
4. by adjusting the move handle so as t…
I don't think there is a setting. You can use the anchor constraint to prevent one component from moving, though. I f you don't specify anything, the lower in hierarchy component will always move towards the higher (=closer to root) component. So, b…
Badge
© 2010 Created by SpaceClaiming.
