The Online Community About Exciting New CAD Technologies
To save as STEP for ProE from SC
I'm not sure where the problem might be (in ProE or SC), but, when I save as "step" from SC and I try to open the file (part or assembly) in ProE I frequentely have problems (gaps or corrupted surfaces).
Has someone tryed to do the same?
Thankyou
Matteo
Has someone tryed to do the same?
Thankyou
Matteo
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Horrox on -
Hi Matteo,
Im also having a similar problem going from SC into EdgeCAM using either step or iges. I just have the standard translators but it seems getting data out of SC is a bit of a problem :-(
Rgds,
Paul
-
Permalink Reply by martin kopplow on -
Paul,
as far as I can see from their website, the makers of edgcam use ACIS, at least for some of their stuff. Maybe you should try to use the native ACIS format of both SC and EC then for file exchange, to minimize the potential for translation trouble?
Martin
-
Permalink Reply by Matteo Pellizzoni on -
I think that would be a good solution, but sometimes customers ask me to send a STEP or IGES file, so I don't have the possibility to choose a different format.
I'm making some tests changing ProE "accuracy" and with lower values things work better (but some problems still remain).
-
Permalink Reply by Paul Horrox on
-
Yeah me too !! Has your model been built completely in Spaceclaim Matteo?
-
Permalink Reply by Matteo Pellizzoni on
-
Hi Paul.
The model I'm trying to open in ProE as STEP (exported from SC) is a STEP made with NX than imported to SC and modified and finally exported again as STEP 203 (I need it for a simulation in ProMechanica).
Advertising
Latest Activity
Thanks for the reply.
1. I have played around a little bit with it. It's a very powerful tool for selecting elements with in solids, but doesn't work at all with components. It would be nice if that selection tool would find attributes of a compone…
Hi Dennis,
1. Did you notice the selection tab under the component tree? You might want to play around with that one and see what it can do for you.
4. You can move any direction you like, but you need to use the move tool. I know Cinema4D as quit…
As a drawing is always referring to a certain component, it will by default include everything within the component. It would be possible, though, to create one more drawing and hide those elements not needed for the purpose. If you go on with your…
Thanks for the reply.
1. This worked. Although I would like to see something similar to Rhino's selection filter. Where you can filter out certain elements before you draw a selection box. For instance if I wanted to just select components it would…
I was thinking of something similar to Microstation's clip volume. Although maybe I am thinking about wrong. If you have a large complex assembly and want to show a detail of how 2 parts fit together without showing all the other parts around it. Ho…
Hmmm... I could not find any anomalities in SC 2010 so far. I think the hierarchy driven alignment preferences have always been ab bit ugly. I'd prefer if the alignment direction would be defined by the sequence of selection. The object selected fir…
In former versions I did not have any problems with it. But with V.2010 it is unpredictable. I agree with you Martin that the anchor constraint wil work but it is extra mouseclicks and I do not believe this is the way it is supposed to be.
These are the choices you have, no depth. Never heard of that one, though.
Martin
1. right click on model -> select -> component/body/face
2. no, except they are all inside one big component.
3. No, unfortunately, except for mirrored ones, as the mirror plane will appear as you select them.
4. by adjusting the move handle so as t…
I don't think there is a setting. You can use the anchor constraint to prevent one component from moving, though. I f you don't specify anything, the lower in hierarchy component will always move towards the higher (=closer to root) component. So, b…
Badge
© 2010 Created by SpaceClaiming.
