SpaceClaiming

The Online Community About Exciting New CAD Technologies

Franco Folini

New Whithe Paper: Simulation-Driven Product Development with SpaceClaim

Summary

The traditional engineering process saw an engineer creating a design, testing it, and iterating
prototypes until the design performed as desired. Although this workflow predates CAD and
CAE technology, many manufacturers’ design processes continue to follow it. The first wave
of simulation technology reduced the need to test physical prototypes, but now the role of
simulation has evolved beyond just validating CAD models. Finally, the laws of physics are
starting to drive product design.

How can an organization efficiently implement simulation-driven product development? The
key to developing a cutting-edge design process is to ensure that large changes occur early
in the design process. Engineers must strive to find optimal concepts as quickly as possible,
balancing complex tradeoffs before detailed CAD work commences. With the traditional
iterative model, engineers are confined in their design, thereby missing breakthroughs that a
more novel approach could produce. Without testing performance prior to detailed design in
CAD, significant changes arise late in the design process when they can be disruptive and
expensive to implement.

Until recently, simulation would lag detailed design because 3D models did not exist until
designers finished the CAD models required for simulation. To break this chicken-or-egg
dependency, engineers are now introducing an inexpensive, preliminary design phase that vets
concept models using simulation before detailed design and design-for-manufacture begin.
This preliminary design process has been proven in niche, high-budget industries where
manufacturers can invest in specialized CAD personnel who are dedicated to serving the
needs of conceptual engineers. However, most manufacturers cannot justify the costs and
time constraints of adding CAD staff to support the conceptual design process.

For up-front simulation to be successful, engineers need 3D tools that are accessible, powerful,
and easy to deploy. Most manufacturers find traditional, detail-oriented CAD systems too
expensive and complex to be sensibly deployed to all engineers. However, new 3D tools
powered by direct solid modeling finally make it practical for all engineers to work in 3D.
Unlike history-based systems that constrain design edits, emerging direct modeling tools foster
creativity and substantive engineering early in the design process. Direct modeling helps
engineers evaluate the best approaches before detailed design commences.

Read the White Paper [PDF]

Comment

You need to be a member of SpaceClaiming to add comments!

Join SpaceClaiming

Advertising

Latest Activity

Thanks for the reply. 1. I have played around a little bit with it. It's a very powerful tool for selecting elements with in solids, but doesn't work at all with components. It would be nice if that selection tool would find attributes of a compone…
21 hours ago
Hi Dennis, 1. Did you notice the selection tab under the component tree? You might want to play around with that one and see what it can do for you. 4. You can move any direction you like, but you need to use the move tool. I know Cinema4D as quit…
yesterday
As a drawing is always referring to a certain component, it will by default include everything within the component. It would be possible, though, to create one more drawing and hide those elements not needed for the purpose. If you go on with your…
yesterday
Nancy Richards is now a member of SpaceClaiming
yesterday
Thanks for the reply. 1. This worked. Although I would like to see something similar to Rhino's selection filter. Where you can filter out certain elements before you draw a selection box. For instance if I wanted to just select components it would…
yesterday
I was thinking of something similar to Microstation's clip volume. Although maybe I am thinking about wrong. If you have a large complex assembly and want to show a detail of how 2 parts fit together without showing all the other parts around it. Ho…
yesterday
Mario Lafontaine and prasad jagtap joined SpaceClaiming
on Tuesday
Hmmm... I could not find any anomalities in SC 2010 so far. I think the hierarchy driven alignment preferences have always been ab bit ugly. I'd prefer if the alignment direction would be defined by the sequence of selection. The object selected fir…
on Tuesday
In former versions I did not have any problems with it. But with V.2010 it is unpredictable. I agree with you Martin that the anchor constraint wil work but it is extra mouseclicks and I do not believe this is the way it is supposed to be.
on Monday
These are the choices you have, no depth. Never heard of that one, though. Martin
on Monday
1. right click on model -> select -> component/body/face 2. no, except they are all inside one big component. 3. No, unfortunately, except for mirrored ones, as the mirror plane will appear as you select them. 4. by adjusting the move handle so as t…
on Monday
I don't think there is a setting. You can use the anchor constraint to prevent one component from moving, though. I f you don't specify anything, the lower in hierarchy component will always move towards the higher (=closer to root) component. So, b…
on Monday

Badge

Loading…

© 2010   Created by SpaceClaiming.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service